In the generation that has
passed since the golden summer of 2005 England’s cricketers have gone from being mainly the products of state schools to being mainly not. One look at the decline and it looks like the state-educated may be nearing the end of the line, talent without the right schooling in cricket not enough.
A problem, about which it seems there is quite a lot of agreement. But one prone to exaggeration as well? The 20% count from the 2025/6 Ashes is of Ben Stokes (who moved to England when 12), Matt Potts and Mark Wood, three players out of the 15 who appeared in the series. Include in Harry Brook and Joe Root who went to state schools before getting scholarships and the % goes up, include them out and count appearances rather than heads and it goes down.
Tweakable stats, although players with a scholarship since Ashley Giles in 2005 number 11 (of 107 in all). Players privately educated younger, older players less so now is also the pattern in county cricket, where the decline in the state educated in the last decade has been stark.
| County Players % | 2005 | 2015 | 2025 |
| State Educated | 67 | 60 | 39 |
| ..under 25s | 65 | 58 | 30 |
98 players under 25 in 2015, 52 last summer, and with a history of decision-making at the top of the game that might be described as Grassroots Last the decline may very well have further to go. More players coming from ethnic minority backgrounds might to a degree help keep the numbers positive, as might some counties, but the big question now is how much gets invested to impact the 2030s?
| State Educated 2025 % (under 25s in brackets) | |
| 1 Durham | 68 (44) |
| 2 Lancashire | 58 (55) |
| 3 Gloucestershire | 58 (43) |
| 4 Leicestershire | 56 (60) |
| 15 Sussex | 29 (17) |
| 16 Somerset | 23 (15) |
| 17 Nottinghamshire | 22 (17) |
| 18 Surrey | 12 (8) |
Data from Cricket Archive