Category Archives: County Cricket

Overseas Players in County Cricket

Barry Richards, Gordon Greenidge, Intikhab at the Oval, wk Jack Richards (1978).

The passing of Sir Garfield Sobers prompted a memory of seeing him in a Sunday League game at Dean Park:  1971, BA Richards b GS Sobers 69.  A decade that started the best of times for overseas players, maybe the best of decades for county cricket, when those at the very top of the game played all formats, all summer, and in an era of dominant West Indians, some of their players most, if not all of those seasons.  In the  first World Cup of 1975, 10 of their victorious side were current players at their counties. 9 of the 37 overseas players that summer  were among the first to be inducted into the ICC Hall of Fame.

2026? In the early part of the season Michael Atherton wrote a piece in The Times ‘Golden age of overseas stars is long gone – are they  still worth the hassle?, pointing to Hampshire’s three attempts at signing a second overseas player, the general problems in attracting players. To which might be added  past criticism of  county cricket’s openness to Australians not helping any with regaining the Ashes, Steve Smith’s high profile time at Sussex in 2023 one instance.

There were 327 players involved In the first eight rounds of the Championship this year, 65 of them not eligible for England. Of those born in Australia, Jake Weatherald  opened  in the Test side last winter,  Nathan McSweeney, Beau Webster and fitness permitting Jhye Richardson  are possibles for the 2027 Ashes.  A help to Australia if the ifs?  The question more the extent of it.

The counterweight, most of the Australians  play Sheffield Shield cricket, where their batting averages tend to be noticeably lower, bowling averages higher;  in line with the idea that the standard is higher than in the Championship, but also that they have more to their game, help give their counties a lift.

Spin Bowling? Simon Harmer, 25 wickets in the April-June months but England’s difficulties with this self-inflicted, scheduling, not the numbers from overseas.  In the era when the West Indians were dominant  comments of a generally similar nature to these were made then, and could also be made now about the South Africans.  Maybe  feelings in relation to Australia are just different.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Players from an Ethnic Minority

Counts of players from a South Asian, Black or dual heritage who appeared in the CC, Blast, ODC.

The numbers of players from an ethnic minority   in  county cricket has  almost doubled in the last five years, predominantly  from a South Asian heritage, their numbers  are  now something like proportionate to the  general UK population. The rise  mainly younger players starting out, most prominently playing  in the ODC.

Players  born early in the school year, into a family with a relative who was/is a FC cricketer and then given all the advantages of a fee-paying school disproportionate among them?

2025 season Nos b Jun-Aug Relative Indy School
All 62 20 10 35
SACA 13 5 0 7

In 2025 not particularly with the birth months(s), but a noticeable number with a brother or father who is or was a first class player. Aryaman Varma at Northants was the first  for a decade if not longer to have been educated at Eton College and with Jafer Chohan,   Harrow and a former player for SACA, makes for a count of  two of the three across the game to have been at one or the other. Despite the referencing at times made to it, county cricket is not ‘Eton-Harrow posh’.

But given the total numbers of  independently educated, 239 in 2025, there are high career-entry costs to a cricket career. Applying a ten-year rule of thumb that those starting out  reflect the  sport about a  decade before, the decline in the state educated since 2015 ought not surprise to anyone who remembers 2005. It has though  been a steep decline and neither is  it obviously at an end.

State-educated under25s  2015  2025
All 98 52
Ethnic Minority 10 16

Players from an ethnic minority probably mean there will be some who were state educated among the under-25s in 2030, but the white majority having declined in number from 88 to 36  in the last decade maybe heading into single figures. Bearing in mind that they relate to around 75% of the general population they are very under-represented talents.

Data from Cricket Archive.

Cricketers Educated in State Schools

In the generation that has passed since the golden summer of 2005   England’s cricketers  have  gone from being mainly  the products of  state schools  to being mainly not. One  look at the decline and  it looks like the state-educated may be nearing the end of the line, talent without the right schooling in cricket not enough.

A problem, about which it seems there is quite a lot of agreement. But one prone to exaggeration as well?  The 20%  count from the 2025/6 Ashes is of Ben Stokes (who moved to England when 12), Matt Potts and Mark Wood, three players out of the 15 who appeared in the series. Include in  Harry Brook and Joe Root who went to state  schools before getting scholarships and the % goes up, include them out and count  appearances rather than heads and it  goes down.

Tweakable stats, although  players with a scholarship since Ashley Giles in 2005 number 11  (of 107 in all).  Players privately educated younger, older players less so now  is also the pattern  in county cricket, where the decline in the state educated  in the last decade has been stark.

County Players % 2005 2015 2025
State Educated 67 60 39
  ..under 25s 65 58 30

98 players under 25 in 2015, 52 last summer, and with a history of decision-making  at the top of the game that  might be described as  Grassroots Last  the decline may very well have further to go. More players coming from ethnic minority backgrounds might to a degree help keep the numbers positive, as might some  counties, but the big question now is how much gets invested  to impact the 2030s?

State  Educated 2025 % (under 25s in brackets)
1 Durham 68 (44)
2 Lancashire 58 (55)
3 Gloucestershire 58 (43)
4 Leicestershire 56 (60)
15 Sussex 29 (17)
16 Somerset 23 (15)
17 Nottinghamshire 22 (17)
18 Surrey 12 (8)

Data from Cricket Archive

Sussex

John Arlott wrote that the purpose of watching cricket is to take pleasure from it; everything else just detail. In the 2000s  Hampshire cricket moved to the  Rose Bowl, and with the like-minded Burgess Hill contingent from Dean Park times, days at the cricket often became days at Hove. Given memory of a cloudless day there in the 70s it was not a difficult decision.

Patrick Ferriday and James Mettyear’s book Field of Dreams has 24 personal accounts of how much the ground has  meant to folks: theatre director Michael Simpkins leading the Harry Baldwin Occassionals, a team now coming up for its 40th anniversary, Paul Weaver when an aspiring journalist acting as John Arlott’s telephonist, which sounds like a great job to have had. As elsewhere a place for boundary chats about stuff and nonsense: how joining the EEC in 1973 had brought with it warmer continental weather. For many a childhood happy place and the emotions return visits bring; for the most part accounts of those born in the decades after WWII.

Those doing the playing? In 1872 the first game was a game for  Victorian  Gentlemen, 11 of them as mentioned in FoD supported by two players; old Harrovians and the great-nephew of Jane Austen at play. In the world of 2025, in what Eliza Filby calls  an Inheritocracy, county cricket is  reliant on  the Bank of Mum and Dad. In short a playing history  that has gone from the moneyed classes to the moneyed classes.

The  general rise in the numbers of privately educated  cricketers  ten years or so after FTA  ending  is also apparent in Sussex teams, albeit moderated by the arrival of Danny Lamb and Jack Simpson, two players now in their 30s.  While it’s not obvious there is strategic shift from buildings to people coming, a glance at the chart and it is obvious it would be better if there were.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Playing too Much?

Do county cricketers have too many playing days? Who knows, as to the simpler  question of how much they do play:  take those who play the most…the red-ballers.. add their  number of Blast and ODC/100 games and the average in the 2024 season for English players was just under 40 days if you take away those  lost to rain, early finishes, just over if you don’t. As stats go though the 40 figure is not especially informative, about one player in four was within +/- 10 days of it.

More than 60 days in a six month season too much, one day off, one for preparation, one playing and beyond that not good?  Maybe, those doing more are not surprisingly predominantly batters, batters who bowl and all-rounders: 63 players in total, the specialist bowlers coming in at 9,10 and 11 countable on the figures of one hand. A problem then with batters feeling the mental strain? Players mental health important obviously, but if that is an or even the main  issue it sits oddly with the argument for playing less to up the  intensity.

But not to underestimate the demands on bowlers, an average of just over 50 days among those that took 20(+) wickets in 2024, those playing less than the overall average countable on one hand and two digits.  When it comes to the physical strains the lot of bowlers certainly gets mentioned at times, but also fair to add that among the  20(+)’s  takers  that a quarter of them were from overseas.

Reason not to exhale against reductions in the County Championship? Playing days are noticeably more than in Australia, but so are the days  played by England’s Test cricketers, and as an explanation for poor showings in Tests  it comes with a rather large maybe, maybe many other things  as well.  Fourth-days in the  CC: watched by folks who watch, good finishes good for playing intensity, the WTC final was a timely show for why 14 of those.

Better in Australia?

England last won an Ashes Test in Australia in 2010/11  since when  0-13. After the 2021/22 series a  review  pointed to a quantity problem with domestic cricket: there’s too much of it.  For every team sheet in Australia’s red-ball competition, the Sheffield Shield, there are four in the Championship, allow  for  the number of players, the weather and there is a  noticeable difference  in the playing days for individual players.

The Sheffield Shield is played almost entirely by Australians,  arguably making it  more focussed,  intense with  the influence of  Test players, past and present, greater. Possibly, although  when it comes to Test cricketers the  Championship with its openess scales up pretty well, and with these numbers also reasonable to ask why isn’t domestic cricket a sizeable advantage to England? Maybe it is of course, just not obviously  given a legacy of  spending big on buildings and not giving enough for  the playing base.

When Joe Root tossed up at the Gabba in 2021 he was starting his 13th Test that year, Pat Cummins his third, and England’s players continue to play on more days  because England continues to play more Tests; an average of 75 days to the Australians 61 in 2024(/5). No doubting either how reliant England’s Test team has been  on those who play the most, almost half the names on  team sheets those who had a schedule of 100 days plus. A too much problem, but £, Sky, T20 leagues and market forces; or,  actually okay, England’s best in demand and just doing what they should be doing?

Going from year to season the number of playing days for English players, averaging 75 and 39, is in proportion. Some variation between the counties certainly, different numbers of players, how much white-ball they play etc, but  not a  concentration of smaller counties near the top of the table. Plainly other Test nations put out competitive teams with fewer domestic players, but in England, starting from here, it’s not obvious that contraction below would result in an advance above.

 

Data compiled from Cricket Archive.

Players from Ethnic Minorities

The number of county cricketers from an ethnic minority has risen sharply in recent seasons, predominantly players with a South Asian heritage. Samit Patel, whose career started in 2002,  now the game’s 2nd senior pro, Chris Jordan and Keith Barker among the players who started before 2010, though the increase above is mainly from younger players starting out rather than careers lengthening.

Ethnic minorities previously under-represented but  now no more? Going back the 1991 census gives around 10% aged 0-4   from a Black or South Asian background, a figure close to the numbers playing county cricket in 2015, although allowing for  migration  some way under that for the wider population then. In the 2021 census the 18-24’s from an ethnic minority were around 20%, county cricketers under the age of 25 last summer 29/162, 18%.

What  differences in the %s are reasonable is hard to know, with of the order of  350-400,000  (male) births in a year it’s not obvious that in every occupation the numbers  should be close.  Around  30-40 openings each year in county cricket: the numbers of recreational players  reason  for thinking the ethnic minorities might be  or should be a higher %; pushing the numbers the other way the sizeable  differences between ethnic groups going to University and the alternative career prospects that follow.

Most players in the county game  are either related to someone who played first-class cricket,  or have been educated at a fee-paying school. It’s in the family blood, or the bank accounts. This is also true of those that come froman ethnic minority,  those that have started in recent years included. A trend to lead to  increasing  numbers of state-educated, ‘working-class’ boys in the game? Going by the numbers here not by much, if at all.

A Game for Minorities?

Better  sporting news recently with the decision to extend FTA coverage of Rugby Union’s 6N for the next few years. A generation ago cricket’s governing body took the money, leaving the game’s future to take care of itself rather.  Not good for getting young players interested, move on  a  decade or so from the decision and the reliance on public schools for county players quite unsurprisingly started rising, more push than nudge and arguably now more shunt than push.

A game heading up-market, getting posher as well? Personally, an Etiquette Board for spectators  was a new one last summer but among  the players if posh is Eton-Harrow posh, then not particularly.  In 2005 Hampshire teams included an old Etonian but in the men’s game since 2015 none found in the archives, old Harrovians three in 2024, one of whom has since retired. But no doubting the concentrations of players from some schools, 12 from King’s College, Taunton in 2024, Millfield, 9 or the connections at some  counties. Or the (‘career entry’) cost, sums well in to six figures, times if siblings.

For the women’s game the  records  are much less complete, across the three main competitions last year  34/68 privately educated, 123 players in all, a higher % among the under-25s; so possibly not so very different to the men, albeit the span of the possible is wide. Players with a South Asian heritage not as many, no salt needed.

In 2024 the most common name on the county circuit was Singh, 5 players,  a marker for the future  maybe. In all  a (conservative) count of 55 players from an ethnic minority,  up to nearly 20% of  the under-25s in 2024, converging if it hasn’t already converged on the % in the general population. A game for all? Not that,  two minorities be better than one, or three  if players who are related to other county players are included, but also a very obvious message about state schools.

 

The Lucky and the Privileged

Freddie Fintoff’s Field of Dreams series starts with the comment that to play cricket you have to be lucky or privileged, better if it  wasn’t like that, then a clip from the 2005 Ashes. Luck, or at least family influences important in ‘getting cricket’, making a career out of the game: FoD makes clear Freddie’s career owed much to his father, two of his teammates that summer were related to Test cricketers,  five others had a brother or father who played for a  county side.

In 2024  around one in five who played for the 18 FCC were  related to someone who play(ed) for one of the 18, or play(ed) first-class cricket elsewhere, more than one in three if the marker is premier league club  or above. Family a formative influence but also no doubting the big generational change in educational backgrounds.

2005 2024
English players 298 371
Relatives who play(ed) FC/18FCC   51 73
…played for the 2s/NatC/PLclub 44 63
Ind School 90 207
Rel FC/18FCC, or Ind School 114/269 (42%) 232/361 (64%)
…under 25s 54/126 (43%) 112/156 (72%)
Compiled from Cricket Archive, Cricinfo No educational info  29 No educational info 10

The players that have been starting out in the 2020s have mainly come from families of county cricketers, a truly tiny % of the general population, and the privately educated; those that are  born in to it and those that can pay to get there. By 2030 many  starting out then will be lights that set off  towards the end of the last decade, when the cumulative effects of all things paywall era were being felt; given the numbers here is cricket going to be a public school profession for them?

It might be. Taking a figure of 150 + players for the under-25s then at least some with different backgrounds  could reasonably be expected, although in the Blast last summer the figure for the under-25s was (counting appearances) 80%, for 8 of the counties 100%;  markers for where an incoming tide was.

There is  south-north divide of sorts which may  be a limiting influence,  but the long-term rise shows no sign of decline, 155/326 were independently educated in 2019,  and may be accelerating. VAT on independent schools to help? More club cricket a better route for developing the most  talented and with it a re-balancing from south to north, it might take a few years but stranger things.

All players (under25s) % 2024 2019
Surrey 93 (100) 71
Hampshire 78 (89) 63
Somerset 78(82) 59
Sussex 75(92) 76
Durham 42(57) 43
Lancashire 40(54) 18

Players who attended an independent school and/or have a relative that play(ed) 18FCC/FC cricket

Overall not great, much of it a legacy from a generation at the end of the last century who forgot the transfer of school playing fields, followed on in this one by some forgetful cricket administrators.  Money now consequences later, into which pattern in 2025 equity sales in The 100; funds from the  future to  pay the players more, take the competition up-market. While  enough might be being done to widen the playing base how, if at all, it will impact those who make it to the top is another question.

 

Overplayed Players?

Compiled from Cricket Archive, England-qualified players.

Counting the days county cricketers played last summer at one end of the spectrum Tazeem Ali, who as a 17-year old made an appearance in the Metro Bank Cup for Warwickshire, at the other Matt Critchley,  70 days plus for Essex. The median  was 29  (50% playing more, 50% less), the mean average 33. Too much? The season ran for almost six months, 177 days.

Twice these numbers too much? Framed as one day on stage, one day preparation, one day off is not way out of line with at least some of the professions; almost 90% of 360+ players played  less than 60 days, those more were not far from the 1:1:1 ratio. The Strauss HPR proposals for a 10 game County Championship, all changes done would have meant a max of 70 (74?) days, not all that much of a solution to the problem(s) as seen by its advocates.

A very conflicted schedule with player welfare at best secondary?  Nick Friend’s piece in the  Cricketer pointed to Glamorgan in the middle of last summer: a Championship game in Durham, then Chelmsford, then five journeys to and from South Wales;  nine games in 22 days. A recipe for fatigue? Kiran Carlson and Sam Northeast played in all of them, two of nineteen players for Glams in those games.  A figure fairly typical of  other counties, those playing at Durham making up about half the names on the team sheets.

But a core of players who played CC, Blast and ODC/100 matches, 44 with more than 60 days.  A certain concentration among the smaller counties? For Derby, Leicester and Northampton there were four between them.  Spin bowlers waiting to the end of May to get into games?.. more of those. Good reasons for county members to agree to a reduction in the 14 game Championship? Looking at these numbers not for this one.